From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 03:16:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE6716A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:16:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE38243D58 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:16:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by satie.private.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0J3G5Yv001896; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:16:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:16:05 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050119.121605.465785514.chat95@mac.com> To: mikhail@kittown.com From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: References: Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.16 (Corporate Culture) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why OpenOffice 1.1.4 port does not use WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED option ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:16:11 -0000 In Message-ID: Mikhail Fedotov wrote: Dear Mikhail, > I see that the patch is back again. I'm rebuilding the port to > get some screenshot of "correct" font drawing. "Incorrect" one > is already done. could you please send me a .sxw file? > Note however that I've never seen "correct" drawing in openoffice > because I've started considering the use of openoffice only in the > last few weeks and 1.1.3 was failing to build on my system. I also > wonder if subpixel rendering is used inside of openoffice since I'm > using LCD monitor. :) :) it is okay. it was just adding a patch for me :) -- NAKATA, Maho