From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 16:46:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FBC16A4CE for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C3743D41 for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:46:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3951652FE; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 88642-02-2; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5765218; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:31 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 04B7C6137; Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:29 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Andrew Beals Message-ID: <20040526234629.GE55357@empiric.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Beals , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:46:53 -0000 [redirected to -net] On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Andrew Beals wrote: > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD > distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does > everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? There are ample POP3 servers in the ports collection. I don't feel that anything more than a minimalist outgoing MTA is appropriate for inclusion in the base system; I am sure others share this opinion but I'm equally sure that many don't... Regards, BMS