From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 9 20:39:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA19859 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:39:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from word.smith.net.au (word.smith.net.au [202.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA19853 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:39:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA00508; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 12:47:00 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199710100317.MAA00508@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Kenneth Merry cc: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), sos@sos.freebsd.dk, lederer@bonn-online.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HP 7100i In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Oct 1997 17:03:11 CST." <199710092303.RAA16661@pluto.plutotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 12:47:00 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > The CAM stuff should remove this distinction; one wonders how NetBSD > > would do with this? > > CAM will only remove that distinction if someone implements an > ATAPI/IDE transport layer for it. The CAM code currently only supports > SCSI. I was just about to mail Justin and ask if there was any documentation on writing code to layer under his new CAM stuff. I have a copy of the T13 1153Dr16 document here, and have been studying it in a little detail. So, is there? mike