Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? Message-ID: <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <200606231410.30740@aldan> (Mikhail Teterin's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400") References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <200606231410.30740@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. > Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is > missing. > = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder > = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... I've already asked to x11@... WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47559956>