From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 17 13:36:30 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3EE16A404
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kometen@gmail.com)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E8A13C481
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kometen@gmail.com)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1247531wxd
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=nUIR3uTdxjPLZmv/x/vGWo8N5UEwBE119XBaviq9Qa4Sv7enjvmBA9ijArmpL7xHdFFP/eVg+S0sHsI4MfbzTQFJIxWr0GWrWind57+79Nm2NWksSU7UOPGqIABecu0k+HJexxdc+Pk/JdlkO87vp700zTczQQrOwMRGKILXylU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=f5NnvVRNdYIqq2UyGUWLia325RJQUsLt8YapcHzwXMKniE6pOxVhfxQljBDqFP+6N2i2X4ulm0qBykVDOwhC1FhmmTduLcrp0/U9S8Y3rd+VlpmRgl5+HPjaoR7BzyTUpPNCed8kqp5Z0UmyO38LJ+IlYW+YwpZToLrq9og228s=
Received: by 10.70.102.16 with SMTP id z16mr801062wxb.1184679389006;
	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.41.4 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b41c75520707170636u116aa48fr99dfacc11945c922@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:36:28 +0200
From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>
To: lveax <lveax.m@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <576dcbc20707170624kb671fe4ia5ddac21af93eccd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1>
	<b41c75520707170318r2152b9f0l8d2ec7ea592fe450@mail.gmail.com>
	<469CACEC.1000103@freebsd.org>
	<b41c75520707170618o4106de94g57e60d2c93a68329@mail.gmail.com>
	<576dcbc20707170624kb671fe4ia5ddac21af93eccd@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:36:30 -0000

> > sched_ule:
> >
> > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
> > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
> > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41
> > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47
> >
> > sched_4bsd:
> > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43
> > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02
> >
> > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd
> > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3.
> >
>
> 4bsd vs ULE
>
> -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
>
> -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
>
>
> ULE is always slower?

In my case yes.

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare