From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 17:26:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2A3F69 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757143A5 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB9HQYKd016377 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:26:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195797] [revive port] Patch to fix port /usr/ports/mail/synonym Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:26:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:26:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195797 --- Comment #1 from John Marino --- 1) normally revivals are shown with shar files or patch sets, not descriptions of changes made 2) I know this isn't right because pkg-plist wasn't touched, which would be required based on recent changes to port tree. 3) revival ports need to be accompanied with proof it builds cleanly without error. Ideally with poudriere testport but at least with "make check-plist", "make stage-qa" output, along with portlint output. So right now, this is a no-go. As a side remark, for some reason I can't see SVN linked from freshports but it should be there since it was deleted in sept 2014. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.