From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 9 06:09:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECD71065674 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6168FC08 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from wald.nfv.gwdg.de ([134.76.242.31] helo=pc028.nfv) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MOmon-0003iP-RZ for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:09:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4A55898C.9050907@gwdg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:09:16 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090630) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current References: <1246926782.11597.23.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <4A54FB33.8060705@fgznet.ch> <1247107223.31816.7.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <1247107223.31816.7.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA1 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:09:20 -0000 Since ~ yesterday my CURRENT system notifies as BETA1 # uname -a FreeBSD pc028.nfv 8.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 8.0-BETA1 #0: Wed Jul 8 10:13:10 CEST 2009 xxx@xxx.xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386 If I remember right, than CURRENT (HEAD) remained untouched over the last releases and only changes to next version number (i.e. 7.0 towards 8.0) when the next release was branched? Rainer Am 09.07.2009 04:40 (UTC+2) schrieb Ken Smith: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 22:01 +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> I was successful in installing the image, although, a few packages did >> not install. I did a kern developer package. I guess the packages are >> missing on the .img? > > Correct, no packages with BETA1. It's probably the documentation > packages it went looking for and couldn't find. I'll be providing at > least the docs packages with BETA2. Not sure if I'll start trying to > provide a larger set of packages for the DVD or wait for BETA3 for that > (leaning towards waiting at the moment). >