From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 19 00:57:08 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA10443 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (cisco-ts9-line3.uoregon.edu [128.223.150.84]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA10438 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.2/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA00503; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:56:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:56:58 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: Craig Johnston cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: slow drives with NCR SCSI In-Reply-To: <199612182038.OAA01317@emanon.comm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Craig Johnston wrote: > I was asking about drives that are known to perform well with the > NCR SCSI chip and didn't get much response. Let me rephrase: what > drives are known to NOT work well with this chip? I am contemplating > the 2 gig IBM SCSI drive that currently runs 300-something, I forget > the model number. Can anyone verify that this drive does work well > with the NCR chip, and give some performance numbers? If you didn't get a response, then I'm guessing there aren't any that stick out. Trudge bravely forward and let us know if this is such a case :) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major