From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 14 15:40:57 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F686445D2 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.49.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "gromit.dlib.vt.edu", Issuer "Chumby Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G3bJS2xHhz3QCp for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [73.99.214.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 130F8262; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 888, Issue 1 From: Paul Mather In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:40:49 -0400 Cc: Victor Sudakov , Steve O'Hara-Smith Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9EE124D9-9210-4CBE-8DAE-99BED61768C2@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> References: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G3bJS2xHhz3QCp X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=vt.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.173.49.70) smtp.mailfrom=paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.43 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[paul]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[128.173.49.70:from:127.0.2.255]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[73.99.214.146:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[128.173.49.70:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.934]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:1312, ipnet:128.173.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[vt.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:40:57 -0000 On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 22:47:23 +0700, Victor Sudakov = wrote: > Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:35:44 +0700 >> Victor Sudakov wrote: >>=20 >>> bhyve !=3D Docker. These are different technologies. >>> The Linux equivalent of bhyve is kvm. >>>=20 >>> The closest equivalent to Docker is jail, but jail lacks all the >>=20 >> Nope jail is the equivalent of LXC (containers) on Linux, a = layer >> below Docker. >=20 > Dunno, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_containers lists > Docker and LXC as different container technologies. Maybe Wikipedia is > incorrect about it. IMHO, FreeBSD Jails are more closely analogous to LXD = (https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/) in Linux than they are to Docker or = LXC. (But, you could mimic jails using LXC or Docker.) Somewhat = confusingly, the LXD binary used to interact with LXD "jails" is called = "lxc". :-) (LXD is built atop Linux's LXC.) Cheers, Paul.=