From owner-svn-src-user@freebsd.org Tue Sep 3 14:06:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75014DC3A6 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46N7z30hllz4PCt; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuripv@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1452) id 7C8A31A16C; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:05:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: yuripv@localmail.freebsd.org Delivered-To: yuripv@localmail.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DA615371; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-src-committers@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DEFD69D93; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-src-committers@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 1C12115324; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: src-committers@localmail.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5843515321; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6DC69D8C; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x337oG9X025531; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:50:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x337oGQO025530; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:50:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201904030750.x337oGQO025530@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r345840 - user/pho/stress2/misc In-Reply-To: <20190403074432.GA66279@x2.osted.lan> To: Peter Holm CC: rgrimes@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-src-committers@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3DEFD69D93 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.973,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] Status: O X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:06:08 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:50:16 -0700 (PDT) X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:06:08 -0000 > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:28:45AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > Author: pho > > > Date: Wed Apr 3 07:22:46 2019 > > > New Revision: 345840 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/345840 > > > > > > Log: > > > Added tmpfs to the tested file systems. > > > Added showing file mapping for RW and RO mounts. > > > > > > Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon > > > > > > Modified: > > > user/pho/stress2/misc/mountu.sh > > > > > > Modified: user/pho/stress2/misc/mountu.sh > > > ============================================================================== > > > --- user/pho/stress2/misc/mountu.sh Wed Apr 3 07:09:28 2019 (r345839) > > > +++ user/pho/stress2/misc/mountu.sh Wed Apr 3 07:22:46 2019 (r345840) > > > @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > > > # > > > -# Copyright (c) 2012 Peter Holm > > > -# All rights reserved. > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD > > > # > > > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Dell EMC Isilon > > > +# > > > > Being on the record, it appears as if the date of original > > publication has been obliterated and replaced with a newer > > date. This is moving the date of expiration of the copyright > > forward and has case law that shows this to be the wrong > > thing to do. > > > > You can make it 2012, 2019 but you can not remove the original > > publication date. > > > > I am uncertain how the "you should never remove a copyright" > > rule apply here, so there is also that issue. > > > > So, would this be the right thing to do: > > Copyright (c) 2012 Peter Holm > Copyright (c) 2019 Dell EMC Isilon That would be one way to solve this, did you assign in anyway your original copyright to Dell/Emc/Isilon? If so then the norm for that would be: Copyright (c) 2012 Dell EMC Isilon Written by Peter Holm as a work for hire which I do not think is the case here, your simply doing work as there employee now, and that would take the form you used above: Copyright (c) 2012 Peter Holm Copyright (c) 2019 Dell EMC Isilon > > I guess it's to late to just restore the original? I do not see a need to restore it, so long as it ends up in a correct state. > - Peter Thanks for the quick response, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org