From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 3 13:58:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA19149 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:58:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19144 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:58:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id XAA01245; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:58:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199704032158.XAA01245@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Subject: Re: CD format for backups ? In-Reply-To: <19970403224454.SP47619@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Apr 3, 97 10:44:54 pm" To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:58:31 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to J Wunsch who wrote: > As Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > - use the partition (/dev/wd0f or /dev/rwd0f ?) as the source for the > > CD data > > > > then in order to read the data I would only want to mount /dev/wcd0c as > > FFS instead of cd9660 -- any hope that it works ? > > Well, UFS is currently still a little iffy when it comes to devices > that are not using 512 bytes blocksize. So, ``it depends''. Well I use UFS on 1024byte sector disks, and I know it also works on 2048 byte sectors, so... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..