From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  2 11:50:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 15FE216A4CF; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7E88043D31; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:50:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (marcus@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i12JoNFR031641;	Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:50:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcus@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from marcus@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i12JoNeA031631;
	Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:50:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcus)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:50:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200402021950.i12JoNeA031631@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: sean@mcneil.com, marcus@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/61237: xscreensaver-gnome usage of --without-pam
	inconsistent with gdm
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:50:25 -0000

Synopsis: xscreensaver-gnome usage of --without-pam inconsistent with gdm

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: marcus
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 2 11:49:46 PST 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
I added support for optional PAM support as compiling with PAM by default at
this point would be a violation of POLA.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61237