Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:30:27 +0300 From: "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instafix for FreeBSD ports brokenness on 10.0? Message-ID: <20110930093027.5514aea5@laptop> In-Reply-To: <20110929161240.461ceda8.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110929084725.GN91943@hoeg.nl> <20110929094733.GS5495@droso.net> <20110929134626.8c019ef1.stas@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgmvEJsNoWJVEqJm5PKzg199_jRHyWYb=tk5zMatuTELtw@mail.gmail.com> <20110929161240.461ceda8.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:12:40 -0700
Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> So now tell me how
> .if ${OSVERION} > SOMETHING
> do something
> .endif
>
> in bsd.port.mk
>
> is more risky then that particular commit which can potentially break
> devel/ for all OSVERSIONs.
>
+1.
I can't understand why I (and other HEAD users) should wait 9.0-RELEASE
or 'patch' bsd.port.mk after every ports tree update ?
Also, not so long time ago was commits with LICENSE= x11, Eitan, have
you tried to compile it BEFORE commit ? Why now I talking about
multiple exp-runs and risk?
--
wbr, tiger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110930093027.5514aea5>