From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 21 07:21:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA00403 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 07:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA00397 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id QAA12458 for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 16:20:54 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA10941; Sat, 21 Jun 1997 16:04:01 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970621160401.FP36358@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 16:04:01 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pci_map_mem failed... References: <199706201726.MAA15908@friley01.res.iastate.edu> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199706201726.MAA15908@friley01.res.iastate.edu>; from Chris Csanady on Jun 20, 1997 12:26:11 -0500 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Chris Csanady wrote: > There seems to be some comment in German in pci.c about > this case, so I was wondering if something is broken.. /* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? */ /* * Attention: is this code indeed correct when using a PCI-to-PCI * bridge for the PCI slots, where the onboard devices connect * directly to the CPU-PCI bridge (see Compaq Prolinea problem)? */ Somebody feel free to commit the translation. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)