Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:35:21 +0000 From: Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Need opinion on license type Message-ID: <klGH46jBDsR0qxHeXZuez-w_DrkH_hccWfsJCI5q6KFQYzaoOgfqRVPbRTQLtuy35AAD50996MI8hm-sZgV43Ns7ALJiGoPjdUcOaJEEuzM=@protonmail.ch> In-Reply-To: <14ae93faac0bf373d7371396d5538f7b@bsdforge.com> References: <CAFDf7UKwpqG8oYo=R%2BZqJgz6UWHzptH%2BEZWnWWLbSz1Ht60tdQ@mail.gmail.com> <14ae93faac0bf373d7371396d5538f7b@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> IMO at first sight it seems NONE since it don't match Predefined License > List > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#licenses-license= -list A non predefined License is not NONE, it's a license that you have to speci= fy manually, see for example https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#licenses-license_p= erms-ex1 You can find another example in math/maxima, where I had to add a MAXIMAEXT= RACLAUSE license. If you put NONE, then no permission will be specified, although the license= seems to give some. For example I think dist-mirror is fine. But please keep in mind that I am not a lawyer. Cheers, Lorenzo Salvadore
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?klGH46jBDsR0qxHeXZuez-w_DrkH_hccWfsJCI5q6KFQYzaoOgfqRVPbRTQLtuy35AAD50996MI8hm-sZgV43Ns7ALJiGoPjdUcOaJEEuzM=>