From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 25 07:41:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 10C4C16A4CE; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:41:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.15])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A7BB143D39; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:41:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from dhcp-13.local ([172.16.0.13] helo=dhcp-10.local)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD))
	id 1BzsOw-000BHX-Vw; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:41:01 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:41:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
To: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <412BAAC8.10821.1F94E6D@localhost>
Message-Id: <1F0717EB-F66A-11D8-91E7-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: database tables for VuXML
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:41:04 -0000

Dan Langille wrote:

> On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:35, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> FreshPorts stores PORTVERSION and PORTREVISION as separate text
>>> fields.  I take it that the ranges equations should compare only
>>> PORTVERSION and ignore PORTREVISION.
>>
>> Please not. pkg_version -t is the reference here, when you get 
>> different
>> results something is wrong
>
> I'm confused.  FreshPorts obtains information primarily via "make -
> V". pkg_version works on installed ports only.  FreshPorts is not
> gong to install a port to find out what version we have.  Are we
> talking about the same thing?

   <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pkg_version>

-Oliver