From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 00:09:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C8D16A4D0; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8AC43D2F; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0L09IKR073407; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:09:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0L09I8b073406; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:09:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:09:17 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Joerg Wunsch Message-ID: <20050121000916.GA73235@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Joerg Wunsch , current@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.8; VDF: 6.29.0.73; host: nagual.pp.ru) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (nagual.pp.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:09:18 +0300 (MSK) cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:09:20 -0000 On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:21:37PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > As Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > Errno may be set in case of error with not documented errno. Thats > > how I read it, but I may miss something. > > I read that a bit differently. People please, I want to make it clear, personally I not from POSIX commitee. If you disagree with POSIX, please discuss it on their forums, not with me. All I can is to make some loosely assumptions about their logic. If you disagree that FreeBSD must follow POSIX (as united and superseded things among all several other standards related to the subject), this should be CORE decision. Because in the past POSIX word was final thing for FreeBSD implemetations, not C, not SUS. -- http://ache.pp.ru/