From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 1 10:24:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA16217 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA16210 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 10:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA20509; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:27:18 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 11:27:18 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199602011827.LAA20509@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Brian Handy Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: silo overflow In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Can someone tell me what this line out of my syslog means? > > Jan 27 15:04:24 condor /kernel: sio0: 2 more silo overflows (total 2) > Jan 27 15:04:32 condor /kernel: sio0: 1 more silo overflow (total 3) It means the hardware couldn't keep up with the serial load. I started seeing that recently on my -stable box at home after I upgraded the kernel, and I *never* saw it before. I'm not sure why, but it might be related to the SPL changes Peter/Bruce made. (Just guessing). It's mostly harmless, but annoying since the only load I have is *ONE* SLIP connection running at 115K on a 486/66 which is mostly unloaded when I get these messages. Nate