From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 9: 8: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685A637BF86; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:07:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA86301; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:07:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Ben Smithurst Cc: Will Andrews , Neil Blakey-Milner , Adam , Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) timeout References: <20000712055707.C1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000712061459.D1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000712064405.E1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000712065724.F1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000712131725.A23242@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000712072043.H1690@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000712153329.I11000@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Jul 2000 18:07:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: Ben Smithurst's message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:33:30 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ben Smithurst writes: > Don't you need -R too? Otherwise if I hit ^C thinking "sod this, I'll > finish it later" the file will be deleted, won't it? Or does -r imply > -R or something? 1) at least in my version of fetch(1), -r implies -R 2) the file is not deleted if the transfer times out or is interrupted, but this is actually a bug. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message