From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 08:39:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C31B24; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [31.223.170.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801DC2A7F; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BEC153AAA; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:39:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from smtp.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZD92INU76CX; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:35:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.67] (opteron [192.168.10.67]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD9E153AA9; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:20:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53AA8631.307@digiware.nl> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:20:01 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen Organization: Digiware Management b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd , =?UTF-8?B?VG9tZWsgV2HFgmFzemVr?= Subject: Re: Improve cron(8) References: <53A72666.8090101@cox.net> <53A78C13.8030909@freebsd.org> <53A82008.9050002@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Alfred Perlstein X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:39:11 -0000 On 2014-06-23 18:53, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 23 June 2014 06:26, Tomek WaƂaszek wrote: > >> Hello, >> I got your point. >> From the technical perspective it should be quite easy to implement this >> feature, but I'm not sure whether this will get positive feedback. I >> remeber that there was a discussion on the OpenBSD mailing lists (there was >> even a patch for this) but they don't like the idea :) maybe FreeBSD >> project will like it, I don't know. >> >> At the moment I want to update FreeBSD cron to ISC cron (with all the >> features that FreeBSD has at the moment and ISC does not have) and >> integrate atrun into cron like it was done in OpenBSD cron. After that (or >> faster who knows :)) maybe we should have a discussion about this idea. > > Sweet! > > Well, hm. How should we do it? Can we run both cron's in the same > source tree and just pick which to build/install? They're both > different crons, right? Or is there a common ancestor that makes the > diff not so terrible? The /etc/rc.d/cron already allows for command_path specification. So als long as the 2 versions have different nameing, selection is easy. -_WjW