Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 Jan 2025 21:31:11 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 283794] audio/amarok: KDE music player 3.2.0, QT6
Message-ID:  <bug-283794-7788-j16Q0d0Fgg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-283794-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-283794-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D283794

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> ---
It's fantastic that you are bringing Amarok for FreeBSD back to life! This
player combines many good features that no one else offers in this bundle.

I would like to suggest that your port can also be built with Qt5/KDE5 (as a
flavor). Two arguments for this:

- Under FreeBSD it is not possible to install a complete KDE5 and KDE6 at t=
he
same time, as far as I know. This leads to collisions for a number of KDE
applications. And many users are dependent on KDE5 for the time being, as
numerous other applications only run with it.

- The KDE Amarok project itself points out in its blog that support for KDE=
6 is
still experimental[1]. Full support for all Amarok functionalities is curre=
ntly
only available for KDE5.


If you agree with these arguments, would you be willing to offer both
(KDE5/KDE6) via flavors (or options) and set KDE5 as default? If desired, I=
 can
help with the porting.

And one more thought: Probably it would be good to revive the former Amarok
port audio/amarok v2.9.71[2] and use it as a basis for a diff? Then there w=
ould
be a history of the port commits ...

[1] https://blogs.kde.org/2024/12/29/amarok-3.2-punkadiddle-released/
[2] https://www.freshports.org/audio/amarok

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283794-7788-j16Q0d0Fgg>