From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 19:39:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F16106564A for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 19:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@fud.org.nz) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ABE8FC08 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 19:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so18192042wwf.31 for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:39:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.159.68 with SMTP id i4mr9940831wbx.176.1294513684696; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:08:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: andy@fud.org.nz Received: by 10.227.143.200 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 11:08:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201101060804.56205.jhb@freebsd.org> <2047622233.213674.1294348606324.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 08:08:04 +1300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EmeHYJpmdEMY2tmOFDvCZlL_yPo Message-ID: From: Andrew Thompson To: Jean-Yves Avenard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com, Rick Macklem , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, marek sal , milu@dat.pl Subject: Re: NFSv4 - how to set up at FreeBSD 8.1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:39:07 -0000 On 7 January 2011 14:25, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > On 7 January 2011 08:16, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> When I said I recalled that they didn't do TCP because of excessive >> overhead, I forgot to mention that my recollection could be wrong. >> Also, I suspect you are correct w.r.t. the above statement. (ie. Sun's >> official position vs something I heard.) >> >> Anyhow, appologies if I gave the impression that I was correcting your >> statement. My intent was just to throw out another statement that I >> vaguely recalled someone an Sun stating. > > After hitting yet another serious bug in 8.2 ; I reverted back to 8.1 Has the problem been reported? There is still time to fix serious bugs in 8.2 Andrew