From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 10:56:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06981065675 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008508FC13 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81781 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2012 09:10:27 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Mar 2012 09:10:27 -0000 Message-ID: <4F549BD4.4010905@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:56:20 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <201203011618.q21GIdww086427@svn.freebsd.org> <4F4FB792.5080908@freebsd.org> <4F50E946.3090909@freebsd.org> <20120305061935.GL13644@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120305061935.GL13644@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ivan Voras , svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232345 - user/andre/tcp_workqueue/sys/netinet X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:56:29 -0000 On 05.03.2012 07:19, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:15:24AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > I> > I'm wary on having every other Jon Doe doing his own "research" on the > I> > most optimal icwnd from his point of view. > I> > I> I still think that such prohibition is useless in the light of Linux > I> having it tunable. > > Agreed. We should have a reasonable default, but allow people to shoot > theirselves in their foot. Some people really demand this possibility! Thing is they don't shoot into their own foot but everybody else's foot in a non-obvious and difficult to debug manner. While it is user-changeable in Linux it not through the normal easy /proc path equaling a sysctl on our side. FreeBSD never had the option to adjust the ICWND except through enabling rfc3390. I'll hold it the same with this one and refuse to make it arbitrarily user tuneable. It really is not something a normal user/admin should touch. -- Andre