From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 14:05:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B8116A4CE; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:05:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D7B43D54; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id iAJE5H7r016625; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:05:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:05:17 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200411191405.iAJE5H7r016625@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Alexander Nedotsukov In-Reply-To: <419D623A.9090009@FreeBSD.org> References: <20041112133305.4b49aa90.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20041116131451.773bcb96@dolphin.local.net> <20041118200050.5ceb1f65.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20041118095710.332b23dd@dolphin.local.net> <200411181816.iAIIGLkZ083067@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <419D623A.9090009@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.11 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:05:18 +0900 (JST) cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: nork@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devel/libgtop2 cannot build X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:05:25 -0000 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:02:18 +0900 Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > >>>>/usr/ports/devel/libgtop2/work/libgtop-2.8.1/sysdeps/freebsd, > >>>>works for me under CURRENT. > >>> I confirmed that it looks good, by running gnome-system-monior. > >>> It didn't crash. > >>Yes, I did the same. The omission of those two assignments seems to do > >>no harm. Of course, I could be wrong. :-) > > No problem for me:-). I think this is OK. > > GNOME maintainers, how about it? > Proposed patch commited. Thank you very much!