From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 3 22:40:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FF416A47A for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138B743D46 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k53MeJ4m070526 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k53MeJjQ070524; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:40:19 GMT Message-Id: <200606032240.k53MeJjQ070524@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Subject: kern/97057: IPSEC + pf needs note? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:40:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/97057; it has been noted by GNATS. From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: kern/97057: IPSEC + pf needs note? Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 17:38:04 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from Max Laier ----- anyone up for taking responsibility for this? I don't think we should change GENERIC for it, but it should clearly be documented somewhere somehow. Thanks.