From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 8 21:20:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9468D106564A for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B138FC12 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1536804eyd.3 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DxIjbiA7D+66vWd+nKscXX+YtqWLnaV5icj1jQkhuto=; b=n+d+0Vh6qHKSmO+KEQqUZ52LwmJiGfya4q7Dc7+XRVKb5ypqW6VMTzCCh8lShZNb8D R/0iQq6Xk79/0E9JmRkdb09qpDTLx6RCHqmN7V0kyBnsSK9iNQnLEJUUps6Flcm9gzZ1 5+eYelojbVW1ylmw5CcQoGmhO8BCg4K3+HkTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HKT1FOHbJ147elWnIZkgyGBPaFN9ivyu/c8gO7Gm9M6/ZCRlsdNWbmhSsJNv7kUeiF GkT2T2GHIJOdYKi1HdVEoZCaOSpB9ktIPUGOYURKdaAgw4EA1TscyTbqkN94PNWWFLnO uHMstesX7Jq/bp9B7663PqR3/gdkdZEw2FagQ= Received: by 10.210.62.3 with SMTP id k3mr5869973eba.41.1247088047054; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1058960eya.16.2009.07.08.14.20.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:20:41 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090708222041.470ad9e1@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090708200028.GB58203@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200907081450.18010.meslists@yahoo.fr> <20090708200028.GB58203@osiris.chen.org.nz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.4; i386-portbld-freebsd7.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:20:48 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200 Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: > > THat's the point ! > > > > isnt that -R implied by -N ? > > > > From the portupgrade man page > > > > > > [...] > > -N > > --new > > Install a new port/package when a specified package is not > > installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the > > required packages are upgraded. > > No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up > to date. I don't understand what you're are saying here. My reading of the manpage is the same as Dan's: when you install kdeadmin with portupgrade -N, everything that kdeadmin requires will be upgraded i.e. "brought up to date".