From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 20 08:54:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA20410 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:54:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA20402 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:54:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA38738; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:53:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Peter Wemm Cc: Sheldon Hearn , John Polstra , yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: another syscons update References: <199901201629.AAA20789@spinner.netplex.com.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 20 Jan 1999 17:53:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:29:54 +0800" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm writes: > config -r? I'd be highly suprised if this was needed at all for 99% of the > time. The only time that I've been aware of it being needed was quite some > time ago when there was an option that got removed - if people were using > it, that option wouldn't get cleaned out from the .h files, and it caused > a problem somewhere. Old-style options weren't placed in .h files, but passed on the command line, so they broke the dependency system. Perhaps that is what you are referring to? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message