Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:40:00 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: UNIX - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post Message-ID: <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> References: <BFE16982B9EB3D6BADF911A8@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <B0018098-1130-4D89-9774-1B241737D6FD@dpcsys.com> <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========E2AC1617C2A37B95E235========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 06:08:14 +0000 Joe Holden=20 <joe@joeholden.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other >> than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet >> at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. >> I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. > Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route > entry) > Care to give me a bigger hint? I'm not a routing guru. I tried this with no luck: route delete 66 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete host 66: not in table Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========E2AC1617C2A37B95E235==========--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789>