From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 17:32:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAAE1065670 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B38B8FC08 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so1183938laa.13 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qNteq/J9GvZ0TfKyP/Pod1DPUe7oqlV51e0+WpBnPjo=; b=HjTLsSZdKcqysU8dBbC3e64vnMJVHNe8qqL3Vx9saJqp6W0Eah/cuPjEDYz2svFEuA efGWu8Yz7xKMjsW/Ti2nQpVVNM2mwgv+wV6Vm7MrHM77S7nUmnE/b8k3XQpXm1A+rcLY HbucPqKag7DqMCVJSbr4kJfEL54ZR3sWbdUjpJZxjx9mHj9lPX9tO1lCA6iXfqm2uW8/ Zdhc1BSNiI7mQk9UqjBVr6vmWmjt+8KhdZ4b/wkGamOS34yMgdNwwT/ne32ng5KciVq5 /KzBsLb/9J1pbljuo6HjzfJPB79FddJb0kAXyqB8rHIyBlAES9MsdvvmFwjM0Uf8OGSO Grcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.99.71 with SMTP id eo7mr404290lbb.84.1338485549076; Thu, 31 May 2012 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.99.164 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2E9D8528-720F-4C35-B047-2887C914CC4D@my.gd> References: <2E9D8528-720F-4C35-B047-2887C914CC4D@my.gd> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:32:29 +0100 Message-ID: From: Kaya Saman To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Oscar Hodgson Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:32:30 -0000 On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > As a side note and in case you were considering, I strongly advise against Linux + fuse ZFS. > Yes I agree; as far as I understand ZFS in Linux is still in testing and in any case not part of the Linux kernel which means dramatic performance degredation, like trying to use Firewire (IEEE1394) on any thing other then a Mac, Regards, Kaya