From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 10:58:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A365216A400; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [82.208.36.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D0713C448; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B7919E02A; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:40:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AFC19E027; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4677B2A0.2040601@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:40:32 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20070619065304.GA460@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20070619065304.GA460@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: request: state of the art of jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:58:44 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > I have a customer who is interested in expanding jails to include > multiple IP addresses. Since from my reading the Network Virtualization > work isn't imminent, I'm looking to see who else has worked on this (and > jails in general). There is an extant patch in kern/69064 which I'm > looking at but would need refinement. Are there others? For Your information - there is new mailinglist freebsd-jail@freebsd.org where things like this are discussed. PJD multiple IP patch exists for a long time and I don't understand why it is not commited. Even last year SoC project for Jail resource limits. Is there any hope that these patches will be imported in to 6-STABLE or 7.0-CURRENT? Miroslav Lachman