From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 08:39:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F3E1065691; Fri, 9 May 2008 08:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0398FC1C; Fri, 9 May 2008 08:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE21106F94; Fri, 9 May 2008 04:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 May 2008 04:39:27 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: bOl4bCcfBhGBk6oCZbDA9Qh7IhwjlchMvOyPzF4KyqPl 1210322366 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6666E27617; Fri, 9 May 2008 04:39:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <48240DBD.9050202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:39:25 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080423) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <200805072310.30158.jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> <20080508122907.GA1941@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080508122907.GA1941@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Justin Hibbits Subject: Re: Byteswap and UFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 08:39:28 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I did the read-only part, ie. you can mount UFS file system read-only > created on system with different byte order than yours. Read-write > support is much harder. Also the NetBSD's way of doing it is very > intrusive to the UFS source - number of changes is a scary. I was trying > to do it a bit differently (on lower level), which went nice for > read-only, but may be harder for read-write. The code was never > committed. > Surely Kirk is willing to review something on this scale, and give his buy-in? The lack of this functionality is going to impede progress on supporting embedded systems. cheers BMS