From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 06:09:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A104916A41F for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:09:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jflemer@uvm.edu) Received: from eagle.uvm.edu (eagle.uvm.edu [132.198.101.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D31A43D45 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jflemer@uvm.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.15] (c-67-166-49-88.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.166.49.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by eagle.uvm.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAG69FoT002613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 01:09:20 -0500 Message-ID: <437ACD0E.9020906@uvm.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:09:18 -0700 From: "James E. Flemer" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050826) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ari Suutari References: <02bb01c5e8f3$1d1e2920$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> In-Reply-To: <02bb01c5e8f3$1d1e2920$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, jflemer@alum.rpi.edu Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: arm-elf-gcc-2.95.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:09:24 -0000 Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting development on an embedded arm board and would > like to use FreeBSD as development platform. I found out that you > are maintainer of arm-elf-gcc295 port. > As winarm seems to be gcc 4.0.x, do you have any plans to upgrade > this port to newer gcc versions ? That would make it easier to use > same arm makefiles from winarm & linux folks (as there seem to > be differences in compiler options with older/newer gcc versions) > > Regards, > > Ari S. I do not currently have any plan to upgrade this port to a newer version. I think that if a gcc-3.x or gcc-4.x cross compiler is needed it should be added as a separate port due to the significant difference from 2.95. I, for example, want to use 2.95 to produce binaries compatible with a certain embedded system that I do not have source for. Perhaps I am unique in this need for an older version. I did attempt to make a port for arm-elf-gcc-3.4.4 but didn't really get too far. Perhaps I could help if you (or someone else) decides to make an updated port. -James