From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 10 11:27:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C5E37B422 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:27:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3AIR3H89467; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200104101827.f3AIR3H89467@earth.backplane.com> To: David Xu Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vm balance References: <16533681351.20010410175337@21cn.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :I heard NetBSD has implemented a FreeBSD like VM, it also implemented :a VM balance in recent verion of NetBSD. some parameters like TEXT, :DATA and anonymous memory space can be tuned. is there anyone doing :such work on FreeBSD or has FreeBSD already implemented it? : :-- :David Xu FreeBSD implements a very sophisticated VM balancing algorithm. Nobody's complaining about it so I don't think we need to really change it. Most of the other UNIXes, including Linux, are actually playing catch-up to FreeBSD's VM design. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message