Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:58:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org (Michael Lucas) Cc: jswarner@uswest.net (Joe Warner), freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD Magazine? Message-ID: <200010022058.NAA10367@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20001001184041.A58830@blackhelicopters.org> from "Michael Lucas" at Oct 01, 2000 06:40:41 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why would advertising be such a big problem, since most applications > > that are made for Linux, will run on *BSD? What products are > > made for Linux exclusively and won't run on *BSD? > > While advertisers do make products that *run* on BSD, they don't > advertise their products as being usable on BSD. All the difference. This is wrong. Many companies support BSDI or FreeBSD versions, and have since the glibc2 debacle made it nearly impossible to maintain only a single Linux distribution. A good example is Zend, which builds a PHP optimizer, and distributes 1 FreeBSD version and 3 Linux versions of the same program because of binary incompatability between Linux distributions. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010022058.NAA10367>