From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May 11 11:28:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA29750
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA29694
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA00857; Sat, 11 May 1996 13:27:54 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu: jfieber owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 13:27:53 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
X-Sender: jfieber@Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: java-port-bsd@portia.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Java support in BSD kernel!?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.92.960510123809.282A-100000@hamby1>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960511132543.755A-100000@Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 10 May 1996, Jake Hamby wrote:

> availability), I'm not concerned about doing this myself.  In fact, I'm
> doing all my Java development on Solaris/x86! (I know this makes me a
> "traitor" to BSD, but at least it's not Windoze :-)

For the record, the linux JDK port seems to work fine on the May
1st 2.2 snapshot, appletviewer and all.

-john

== jfieber@indiana.edu ===========================================
== http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ================