From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 14:06:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188BB1065670 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67158FC14 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2008 10:06:04 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id PBD21329; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:06:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2008 10:05:57 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18641.3781.298421.615325@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:05:57 -0400 To: unga888@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <417898.61773.qm@web57005.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <87wshboz40.fsf@kobe.laptop> <417898.61773.qm@web57005.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to split a C string by a string? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:06:05 -0000 Unga writes: > Thank you very much for the reply. That is, there is no existing > split function. Not in standard C. There may be in third party libraries; however linking against, oh, GTK just to get the one function seems ... excessive. Robert Huff