From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 11:37:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBABC76 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CC81827 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA02255 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:37:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ynmm7-000JK1-OM for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:37:03 +0300 Message-ID: <554213A6.1090503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:36:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: gconv and kernel References: <553EAD20.8010701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:37:14 -0000 On 28/04/2015 17:39, Alan Somers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> I wonder if anyone used gcov or maybe some other tool for checking FreeBSD >> _kernel_ code coverage. >> I could find only some very old posts about kernbb... > > > I was unable to find a way to use gcov. But a few years ago I did get > a proprietary product called Bullseye to work. The results browser is > a little cumbersome, but the results seemed accurate. > > http://www.bullseye.com/ Thanks to all who replied on-list (Alan) and off-list. Looks like this would require more effort than I can do now. gconv seems to work with Linux kernel almost out of the box, so perhaps I'll check my code (OpenZFS stuff) there. -- Andriy Gapon