From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 19 9:53: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E60437B401 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C4C43E6A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8JGqxXn015341 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:52:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8JGqxms015340 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:52:59 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200209191652.g8JGqxms015340@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.7-PRERELEASE FAILING!! In-Reply-To: <20020919164416.GA200@leafy.idv.tw> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:44:16 +0800 >From: JY >Another thing is that man SH(1) still lists "&&" as valid operator. Shouldn't that be changed beforehand? ?? Why should that be changed? && is still a valid operator; it just doesn't make sense for the part on the left of && to be backgrounded. Cheers, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org To paraphrase David Hilbert, there can be no conflicts between the discipline of systems administration and Microsoft, since they have nothing in common. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message