From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 16:08:50 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4146937B401; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 16:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru
	[195.34.32.123])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5DF1E43FA3; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 16:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ciam.ru (ppp129-92.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.129.92])
	by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C99BFF8AE9; Fri,  6 Jun 2003 03:08:45 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Message-ID: <3EDFCD7D.30000@ciam.ru>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 03:08:45 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru-RU;
	rv:1.3) Gecko/20030309
X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
References: <3EDE03E3.8090102@ciam.ru> <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
In-Reply-To: <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 23:08:50 -0000

Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Thanks for fixing that.  It worked correctly on my system before using the
> "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that
> command to get it to do the right thing.

I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something 
has changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA?

> Should it be dependent on bash2?  While I agree that it's mostly useless
> without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as
> documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base
> installations?

Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash 
without putting path to it into $PATH.
If so port will satisfied. But if the port will not found bash in $PATH 
it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's reasonable.

---
Sem.