From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 22 01:09:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A2316A44F for ; Mon, 22 May 2006 01:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from mail07.powweb.com (mail07.powweb.com [66.152.97.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4244043D45 for ; Mon, 22 May 2006 01:09:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (24-119-225-24.cpe.cableone.net [24.119.225.24]) by mail07.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CEF14DDDD; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:09:33 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke Message-ID: <20060521200933.7d600cd4@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20060521234850.2fd4d360@mwilke.ath.cx> References: <20060521234850.2fd4d360@mwilke.ath.cx> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: new categorie "meta" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 01:09:18 -0000 On Sun, 21 May 2006 23:48:50 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote: > Hi Friends, > > since creating new categories comes in vogue lately I just wanted to > ask what you think about creating a categorie called "META". Why you > should do that is simple: There are enough ports serving as meta > ports. These include: > > lang/php4-extensions > lang/php5-extensions > x11/xorg > x11/gnome2 > x11/gnome2-lite > x11/kde3 > x11/kde-lite > x11-wm/xfce4 > > usw. > > That would lead to a clearer layout and improved overview of large > applications (esp for newbies). I agree with the rest that it is a bad idea. I do think the though of tagging everything that is a meta port with meta- though. Like with linux binary ports are done. The only one that makes me consider this being a bad idea is x11/xorg, but not quite sure why immediately.