Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 01:39:40 +0300 (EET DST) From: Aaro J Koskinen <akoskine@cc.helsinki.fi> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ICU_LEN with IO APIC Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0206040123470.9357-100000@sirppi.helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: <3CF7E5C9.82526E0A@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Bosko Milekic wrote: > > I'm not sure but perhaps this is historical (and now also required > > again), but if we use a word to mask out interrupts than after 32 we > > run out of bits. "Who needs more than 32 interrupts anyway?!" :-) > > Who needs more than 4? OK, so you guys are running systems with a single IO APIC and even a single PCI bus... Scalable design. :-) A. -- Aaro Koskinen E-mail: aaro@iki.fi "I'm the ocean, I'm the giant undertow." http://www.iki.fi/aaro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.30.0206040123470.9357-100000>