From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 21:01:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24CD16A4CE; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:01:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839D243D45; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:01:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:01:14 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050402120023.3E94F16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20050402125456.B5092@roble.com> References: <20050402120023.3E94F16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tyan k8sr lockups X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:01:15 -0000 Gary Mu1der wrote: >Any idea how we can get more diagnostics on what in FreeBSD is causing >the crash? This wasn't a U320 SCSI system by any chance? The reason I ask is that it is very similar to problem a few months ago, on a Tyan S2881, which turned out to be pci-x bus related. Have also seen similar/identical issues with other Tyan boards when used with U320 SCSI controllers. -- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/ >>From: Ramberto Cumagun >>Cc: Patricia Jadrich , >> Anton Rajakoone , Randy Arruda , >> Chuck Bartlett >>Subject: S2881 / Adaptec 2200S issue >>Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:09:33 -0700 >> >> >>Purpose of this email is to notify you that we have verified the >>compatibility issue with Tyan S2881 and Adaptec 2200S. Root cause seems >>to be timing margin issue with the AMD8131 PCI-X bus. There is an ECN >>that addresses this issue which has been implemented on the S2881 based >>system that was delivered to Tyan Fremont. With this ECN stability has, >>so far, improved though the testings are not yet complete. Results of >>this testing should be done within the next few days.