From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Aug 20 23:55:50 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA18949
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA18938
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca10-63.ix.netcom.com [205.186.214.63]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA12928; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id XAA11436; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199808210655.XAA11436@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: obrien@NUXI.com
CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19980820151249.A7243@nuxi.com> (obrien@NUXI.com)
Subject: Re: new requirement for PLISTs
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * What do people think with requiring "@comment $Id$" at the top of every
 * pkg/PLIST?
 * 
 * In general, being able to refer to a specific revision easily is a Good
 * Thing(tm).

I don't know.  Is it really necessary?  We already have $Id$ lines in
Makefiles, and that's where people usually look at.  Have we had any
bug reports from people who had mismatching PLISTs and Makefiles or
something?

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message