From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 05:42:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE5106567A; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 05:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536B78FC12; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 05:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B3F21ED55; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:43:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.157]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ECC90063; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from localhost ([192.168.3.149]) by localhost (scanner1.m-online.net [192.168.1.157]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7RX8mMTbmbua; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.reifenberger.com (ppp-88-217-86-114.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.86.114]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.reifenberger.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E30531A0B3; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:43 +0200 From: Michael Reifenberger To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20080606054243.GA87241@gw.reifenberger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Priority: normal Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: active/inactive jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:42:47 -0000 Hi, is the assumtion correct that an active jail has at least on process associatet with it and that there can be only one active jail (with the same hostname/ip-number) per system at the same time? Is there an convinient way to get the processes associatet with an jail. So far I found only the method used by killall(1): jail_attach() to the jid and read the process table... Thanks in advance! -- Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.Reifenberger.com