Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:43:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Poy <vince@venus.GAIANET.NET> To: Modred <modred@ns1.antisocial.net> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com>, sthaug@nethelp.no, leifn@neland.dk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poor ethernet performance? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211742150.331-100000@venus.GAIANET.NET> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211906180.15958-100000@ns1.antisocial.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Modred wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote: > > > Speaking about Layer 2 and layer 3. Does the Cisco Catalyst > > 2924XL and the HP ProCurve 2424M and 4000M switches fall under Layer 3 or > > just layer 2? > > Cisco, yes... HP, no clue (perhaps you could check their website). > > 2900XL Architecture Notes: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/switch/cat/2900xl \ > /tech/malbu_wp.htmhttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/ \ > switch/cat/2900xl/tech/malbu_wp.htm > > 2900XL Management Guide: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/ \ > 29_35sa6/index.htm > > IOW, RTFM. I did, it gets interesting though since if it was a true Level 3 switch, it sure seems to perform more like a Level 2. Cheers, Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ] Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211742150.331-100000>