From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jul 31 16:21:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA12086
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA12078
          for <questions@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id QAA21952; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607312320.QAA21952@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: nate@mt.sri.com
CC: darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com, questions@freefall.freebsd.org, me@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199607312216.QAA04264@rocky.mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:16:56 -0600 (MDT))
Subject: Re: questions-digest V1 #1174
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Yes, we want it.  I'd rather have XEmacs than not, and requiring a
 * $100+ package to use it when it's not necessary seems a shame.

No, the other alternative is to use the non-Motif toolkit for xemacs,
at least for building packages.  Under no circumstances will we want
to ship a package with Motif dynamically linked.

 * When you add in the lisp files, adding a couple hundred K more isn't
 * going to make *THAT* big of a difference.

I surely would prefer a smaller binary, provided the functionality is
abouth the same. :)  Michael, do you know how the Motif and non-Motif
versions are different?

Satoshi