From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Nov 28 15:25:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA16811 for smp-outgoing; Fri, 28 Nov 1997 15:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp) Received: from bsd.synx.com (rt.synx.com [194.167.81.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA16802 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 1997 15:25:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from remy@synx.com) Received: from s3.synx.com (s3 [192.1.1.247]) by bsd.synx.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA06981; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 00:29:54 +0100 Received: from rs1 by s3.synx.com id aa19803; 29 Nov 97 0:17 GMT Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:11:08 -0100 (GMT) From: Remy NONNENMACHER To: kdulzo@caffeine.internal.enteract.com cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc564 on SMP In-Reply-To: <19971128220441.16813.qmail@caffeine.internal.enteract.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 28 Nov 1997 kdulzo@caffeine.internal.enteract.com wrote: > Answers one question I had. However the second is how exactly would one > switch teams. And practically which should be joined? The obvious more > effect japan group. Or our own -- > Switching team is quiet easy since reconfigurating client can be done. About JFUG, it seems to be more difficult: their Web site is all Japan 8----O. What would be great is some kind of 'meta-teams' joining separate teams with same goals. This would allow you to act for team-freebsd (leaf), meta-freebsd (branch), meta-Free-Unixes (root) and, why not, team-anti-M$. This would offer more flexibity in expressing our-self. > | to a given team, they're non-transferrable. I also don't think > | that Team FreeBSD is really too keen on merging themselves, even > | if it were possible. > |