From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Jul 29 15:26:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from itchy.serv.net (itchy.serv.net [205.153.153.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6B61560F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:26:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from utz@itchy.serv.net) Received: from localhost (utz@localhost) by itchy.serv.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA09314; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:26:23 -0700 (PDT) From: The Utz Family To: Marc van Woerkom Cc: mestery@visi.com, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Where is Gogo? I cant find it! Re: Gogo vs. Bladeenc, Part II In-Reply-To: <199907292038.WAA01592@oranje.my.domain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi could somebody point me at this, every time i see it mentioned i go out and hunt and i can never find it. btw the LAME homepage is also the home of GPSYCHO which is the psy-a model that is used in LAME. The author slams the ISO psy-a model pretty vigorously, but i dont want to take his word for it until i see the gogo stuff.... On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > > Gogo, which is amazing to me since I previously used bladeenc, which > > gave me 2-3:1 times. And there is no difference in the output quality. > > Gogo works nice, give it a try. > > Any explanation for this miracle? > > . Assembly? > . Different psycho-acoustics? (neglecting that stuff that the human > ear + mind don't notice too much) > > Regards, > Marc > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message