Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Jul 2018 21:42:56 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?
Message-ID:  <5B3B8B70.3050000@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180703070646.kwgixzppye4qbmck@atuin.in.mat.cc>
References:  <0afd6f84-146a-d555-d759-366686259448@rawbw.com> <5B3AB11D.5070601@grosbein.net> <79be1e72-4bf6-6271-f795-8dc3b1b888ce@rawbw.com> <5B3AB657.6020602@grosbein.net> <20180703070646.kwgixzppye4qbmck@atuin.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.07.2018 14:06, Mathieu Arnold wrote:

>>> But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'.
>>
>> Yes. Meantime, you have several choices:
>>
>> 1) Mark the port NO_PACKAGE and/or no-pkg-mirror to force users use a port that
> 
> It is not no-pkg-mirror, in this case, it is no-auto-accept.

According to https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/licenses.html

> no-pkg-mirror
>   Free redistribution of package is prohibited. Equivalent to setting NO_PACKAGE.
>   The package will not be distributed from the FreeBSD package CDN https://pkg.freebsd.org/.

This is exactly what I'm talking about: preventing usage of a package
because pkg(8) does not honor "no-auto-accept" yet.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B3B8B70.3050000>