From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Aug 16 21:50: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF99937B403 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7H4o1u44543; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108170450.f7H4o1u44543@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Heffner Subject: Re: bin/29790: sed "G" command broken Reply-To: Mike Heffner Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/29790; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Heffner To: Jeremy Chadwick Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/29790: sed "G" command broken Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:43:42 -0400 (EDT) On 17-Aug-2001 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: | That would be it. Looks like I have a modification to make to | my own patch it seems. I didn't even consider checking out | the NetBSD tree... Hrm, after applying the patch and rebuilding sed I don't see any difference in the example you provided (ie. both print the 'wrong' output you posted). I know very little about sed, but is there a bug in the example you provided? Mike -- Mike Heffner Fredericksburg, VA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message